feat: reexport resolve at root level

[Deepak8858]

Reexports resolve at the root level of giskard.checks as requested.

Currently users have to do from giskard.checks.core.extraction import resolve.
This change allows from giskard.checks import resolve.

Fixes #2310

[gemini-code-assist]

Summary of Changes

Hello, I'm Gemini Code Assist¹! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request streamlines the import path for the resolve function, making it more accessible and convenient for users. By re-exporting resolve at a higher level in the package hierarchy, it simplifies the API and improves the developer experience without altering the function's underlying implementation or behavior.

Highlights

• API Simplification: The resolve function, previously accessible via giskard.checks.core.extraction.resolve, is now re-exported at the root level of giskard.checks. This allows users to import it directly using from giskard.checks import resolve.

🧠 New Feature in Public Preview: You can now enable Memory to help Gemini Code Assist learn from your team's feedback. This makes future code reviews more consistent and personalized to your project's style. Click here to enable Memory in your admin console.

Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands on the current page.

Feature	Command	Description
Code Review	/gemini review	Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary	/gemini summary	Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment	@gemini-code-assist	Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in pull request comments and review comments.
Help	/gemini help	Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for GitHub and other Google products, sign up here.

Footnotes

1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution. ↩

[davidberenstein1957]

LFTM

[gemini-code-assist]

Code Review

This pull request correctly re-exports the resolve function at the giskard.checks level, improving the library's public API. The changes are straightforward and achieve the intended goal. I've added a few minor suggestions to maintain alphabetical order in imports and __all__ lists, which will enhance code consistency and maintainability.

[gemini-code-assist]

For better code readability and maintainability, it's a good practice to keep imports sorted alphabetically. resolve should be placed after Metric in this import list to maintain the alphabetical order.

[gemini-code-assist]

To improve maintainability, please keep __all__ entries sorted alphabetically within their logical groups. resolve should be placed in alphabetical order within the 'Core classes' group.

[gemini-code-assist]

To improve maintainability, it's best to keep the __all__ list sorted alphabetically. This list is currently unsorted. Please place resolve in its correct alphabetical position. Sorting the entire list would be a great improvement for future changes.