Skip to content

[TODO]: update generated models from apify-docs PR #2275#713

Open
apify-service-account wants to merge 1 commit intomasterfrom
update-models-docs-pr-2275
Open

[TODO]: update generated models from apify-docs PR #2275#713
apify-service-account wants to merge 1 commit intomasterfrom
update-models-docs-pr-2275

Conversation

@apify-service-account
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

This PR updates the auto-generated Pydantic models based on OpenAPI specification changes in apify-docs PR #2275.

@apify-service-account apify-service-account added the t-tooling Issues with this label are in the ownership of the tooling team. label Apr 9, 2026
@honzajavorek
Copy link
Copy Markdown

image

@codecov
Copy link
Copy Markdown

codecov bot commented Apr 9, 2026

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 95.10%. Comparing base (8f140ef) to head (faba7bc).

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master     #713      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   95.12%   95.10%   -0.03%     
==========================================
  Files          45       45              
  Lines        4819     4819              
==========================================
- Hits         4584     4583       -1     
- Misses        235      236       +1     
Flag Coverage Δ
integration 95.10% <ø> (-0.03%) ⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

t-tooling Issues with this label are in the ownership of the tooling team.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants