The syntax to designate a family currently looks like this:
family(store_subscr, INLINE_CACHE_ENTRIES_STORE_SUBSCR) = {
STORE_SUBSCR,
STORE_SUBSCR_DICT,
STORE_SUBSCR_LIST_INT,
};
Here the store_subscr "family name" is redundant (and in fact we even had one case where it was incorrect).
I propose to change it to be more similar to the pseudo syntax, so it will become
family(STORE_SUBSCR, INLINE_CACHE_ENTRIES_STORE_SUBSCR) = {
STORE_SUBSCR_DICT,
STORE_SUBSCR_LIST_INT,
};
This should be a straightforward change to the parser and code generator in Tools/cases_generator.
Linked PRs
The syntax to designate a family currently looks like this:
Here the
store_subscr"family name" is redundant (and in fact we even had one case where it was incorrect).I propose to change it to be more similar to the
pseudosyntax, so it will becomeThis should be a straightforward change to the parser and code generator in Tools/cases_generator.
Linked PRs