The performance of attribute lookup for type objects is worse than for other objects. A benchmark
import pyperf
runner=pyperf.Runner()
setup="""
class Class:
def all(self):
pass
x=Class()
"""
runner.timeit('hasattr x.all', "hasattr(x, 'all')", setup=setup)
runner.timeit('hasattr x.__array_ufunc__', "hasattr(x, '__array_ufunc__')", setup=setup)
runner.timeit('hasattr Class.all', "hasattr(Class, 'all')", setup=setup)
runner.timeit('hasattr Class.__array_ufunc__', "hasattr(Class, '__array_ufunc__')", setup=setup) # worse performance
hasattr x.all: Mean +- std dev: 68.1 ns +- 1.1 ns
hasattr x.__array_ufunc__: Mean +- std dev: 40.4 ns +- 0.3 ns
hasattr Class.all: Mean +- std dev: 38.1 ns +- 0.6 ns
hasattr Class.__array_ufunc__: Mean +- std dev: 255 ns +- 2 ns
Bug report
The performance of attribute lookup for type objects is worse than for other objects. A benchmark
Results:
The reason seems to be that the
type_getattroalways executesPyErr_Format, wheras for the "normal" attribute lookup this is avoided (see here and here)Notes:
Your environment
Linked PRs